Over 58621
politifake

Marriage Politics


STRAIGHT PRIDE - We don't need a Straight Day, a Straight Parade or a Straight Awarness Day! A man and Woman are meant to be together


TAGS: g** straight obama marriage
Rating: 4.13/5

More politifakes by Tranceology

Rudedog - February 2, 2013, 5:38 pm
I bet to save your life you would
rockfan5 - January 20, 2013, 3:05 pm
I honestly would never go g** to save my life, but you have to respect their choices. This is one of the few things i agree with democrats about.


Supreme Court Tyranny -




DON'T LIKE GAY MARRIAGE? - Don't have one. Problem solved.


TAGS: g** marriage
Rating: 2.04/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

TheConstitutionalist - November 28, 2012, 11:51 am
Statistically there are more g** people on the planet than white people. So should we just go my majority rules and say that whites can't marry; because this is your argument boiled down. Plus if someone wants to marry their car...how does that hurt you?
simplegenius - November 28, 2012, 11:07 am
I don't mind g**s, but I don't believe in redefining everything. we already allowed g**s every right of marriage (at least in my state) but where do we draw the line when we redefine anything? it could spiral out of control quickly. Wanna marry your car?


FACTS - Are stubborn things.


TAGS: chick fil a bigot obama boycott homo***ualmarriage
Rating: 4.26/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:54 am
Eating there tomorrow. What does that make me? Hungry
thatmfguy - April 9, 2013, 4:34 pm
Really? so there's no 3rd parties out in Make****upistan?
realogic - March 1, 2013, 9:38 pm
Poor fact. Simply because given the choice between him and a republican (who are very much against same-*** marriage) doesn't give you a lot of leaway aside from not voting at all. d*** stubborn facts.


Warmist Insanity: Climate Change Is Causing Child Marriage -




EQUAL RIGHTS FOR EVERYONE! - Legalize Zombie Marriage; the government has no right to tell you who can and can't marry just because you're dead.


TAGS: legalize marriage zombie
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by nicholsjoshua15

Renza - March 7, 2013, 7:54 am
While there's going to be abuse of all things in life, as humans are naturally somewhat greedy and subversive, it exists in all areas of the spectrum, rich, poor, individual, corporation, democrat, republican, etc.
Renza - March 7, 2013, 7:52 am
That's why I always suggest investing in a cudgel, they require no ammunition, but have a bit higher physical ability requirement.
Cannabal - March 7, 2013, 7:30 am
This is the real reason the gov'ment wants my guns: to allow the zombie menace to grow and take my brain! Not in my backyard!
JGalt - March 7, 2013, 6:34 am
They can't tell you that you can't vote for Democrats either, if you are dead, nor that you can't vote multiple times if you are dead, nor can you not collect and cash welfare checks!


GET THEE BEHIND ME, SATAN! - On second thought......


TAGS: supreme court g** marriage doma
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

OlderThanDirt - April 3, 2013, 10:28 am
Ick.
PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 8:38 pm
:-D


Equality for ALL Americans -


TAGS: marriage equality
Rating: 2.07/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - May 11, 2013, 2:29 pm
republicans = p******** Mormons? There's nothing wrong with Polygamist relationships amongst consenting adults (regardless of gender), not sure how you came to the conclusion that people find p***philia acceptable though.
OTC - May 11, 2013, 1:35 pm
So you are in favor of Mormons marrying mulitiple pre-teen girls?
PapaFox - April 28, 2013, 11:28 am
*WHOOSH*
JGalt - April 28, 2013, 10:50 am
Should liberals be allowed to reproduce?


DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT - Because where else will we arbitrarily draw the line? Pets, children, possessions? LOL




A Child's Wisdom -




Gay Marriage doesn't hurt you. -


TAGS: g** marriage gun control freedom
Rating: 2.82/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:57 pm
Yes, run away, Emma. I know you are a coward. Then again, most sociopaths are. P.S. Sorry to piss you off about your pathological lying, but you are much more useful and entertaining this way. :-) Have fun in anger management class. See ya later. Cheers.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:54 pm
Come down the Earth? I thought you didn't believe in Earth. Funny one. I thought you said the planetary evidence for our planet was a conspiracy thought up by the libs. Try again. ;-p
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:52 pm
Nah, I dig Christ and true Xtians. People who hate g'ays (you) and people who use abortion as an excuse to h'ate women (you) in the name of Christ are X.I.N.Os (Xtians in name only) Doh!
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:51 pm
You might want to quit while you are behind. You're really losing what little grip you had on reality. Anyways, I have to take off, try to amuse yourself while I'm gone and keep both hands on the keyboard. We don't want your mom walking in on you again.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:50 pm
I'm a**uming those meds you keep speaking about might provide an answer to that question, Rod Sterling. :-) Music, voices in your head. Meh, same thing.
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:49 pm
You might want to try to come back down to earth and get a little oxygen in that atrophied brain of yours.
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:48 pm
What a moronic thing to say. You **** all over the bible, you **** all over people who believe in Christ, then you turn around and use it both in a lame attempt to justify your bogus arguments.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:47 pm
You concede. Got it. And, yes, I can quote the Bible. It's just a storybook, after all. Like "Fifty Shades of Grey", just longer. In the meanwhile, just let me know if you find a biblical passage that speaks about Kennedy. LMAO
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:47 pm
Why do I hear twilight zone music when I read your posts?
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:45 pm
You will do nothing, Pinnocchio. You like lying. Remember? Don't worry...in your nation they don't stone 'tools' for lying.lol For being g'ay? Maybe...if you ask a certain Senator named Esk. P.S. If you're gonna rip me off, at least be witty about it. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:42 pm
Oh, and bwahahahahahahaha, hypocrite
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:41 pm
*sigh*lol...Okay, it's like this. You can't have your cake and eat it too. You trash talk religion and the bible, then turn around and use Christ and the bible to try to prove a point.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:39 pm
*sigh*lol..Okay, it's like this. Kennedy didn't exist back in biblical times. Neither did a scientific community and knowledge of climatology. Can you guess what DID exist when Christ was alive? H'omos'exuality. Yet Christ didn't mention this EVER. FTW
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:38 pm
Really? You're quoting a bible from 2000 years (that you ridicule) to prove that g**s should be accepted today? bwahahahahahahah
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:37 pm
OH, he called me Pinocchio, what will I do?
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:37 pm
Really? You're bringing Kennedy and global warming into a debate about Christ's existence 2000 yrs ago? bwhahahahahahahhahahhaha... I didn't know the special Olympics had a debate team. X-D
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:34 pm
Oh, he called me "bonehead". What WILL i do...the shame. And, nah, I wasn't implicating the mods. But certainly seem like you want to. How's that working out for you? Since I've now officially pissed you off, hence the name calling...another tissue? :-)
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:17 pm
and how quick atheists are to use bible quotes in an attempt to bolster their position
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:17 pm
The abomination is atheists being so hypocritical that they trash talk people who believe in religion and get offended when people talk smack to them about their lack of faith.
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:15 pm
Oh, he never ONCE weighed in on the kennedy a**assination conspiracy, or manmade climate change, or any other of your conspiracies either.
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 4:13 pm
You didn't need to,bonehead. Your statement "if my posts being 'deleted' counts." implicates the admins in your delirium.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 4:06 pm
The best wisdom I ever heard on the subject actually came from a Christian.He said,"When it comes to love,and who u should love,if it were up to you,what kind of world would u want to live in?Answer that question from your heart,thats what Christ wants."
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 3:48 pm
The only abomination is the human mind taking a fictional story called the Bible and turning it into a reason to persecute others. There is a reason why Christ, who was pretty thorough in his teachings, never ONCE weighed in against g'ays.Not once. WTF
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 3:46 pm
Say what you will...but I think the church being okay with Ted Bundy getting married (which he did after his first conviction) but being against law-abiding citizens getting married makes NO sense...
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 3:44 pm
I know what you are saying. You are just wrong. The church isn't telling the government to outlaw marriage with murderers. But you are allowed to marry convicts in jail. The church also doesn't forbid adulterers from marrying though it find that a sin
OTC - July 13, 2014, 3:42 pm
You will find that men should marry women and unnatural relations (same ***) is an abomination
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 3:09 pm
Nah, I never mentioned Moo+. Not sure why you are now, other than the obvious (i.e. you're pathologically projecting, again) You might want take your own advice about those meds, conspiracy boy. X-D
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 3:01 pm
bwahahahahahahhahahhahah...Coming from you? I'll consider the source on that one. LMAO.. But don't worry...I don't think it's fair to stone 'tools' over their lying. It's enough you and I know the truth, Pinocchio. Tissue?
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:59 pm
Ah, so now you think moooooo is conspiring against you. Ok, now you really do need some meds.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 2:57 pm
TRANSLATION(EmmaRoydes): I'm a terrible liar. But in sense I'm right...if my posts being 'deleted' counts.
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:51 pm
Oh, and when it comes to being a liar, you take the crown.
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:50 pm
If you really were at least average intelligence, you would see that I've never posted anything that was homophobic. You must be going thru tissues pretty quickly of late.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 2:21 pm
If you really thought that, you wouldn't post homophobic crap. You are a terrible liar. X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 13, 2014, 2:05 pm
The real abomination is fundamentalists and atheists that push their point of view on everyone else. There's no give and take between either of them. Same with people who support g** rights and those that are opposed.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 1:58 pm
Bottom line: the only abomination as far as the bible is concerned is religious fundamentalism. Nuff said.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 1:56 pm
The Bible is open ended for a reason but it's message is clear. Peace on Earth. Heaven on Earth. Love for all. You're warped interpretation of Christ is just that...warping it. People who kill or judge others in the name of Christ totally missed his msg.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 1:54 pm
The point is that the Bible is a lousy, superstitious place to govern a nation, and shouldn't. Ironically, the spirit and message of Christ is unconditional love for all. It makes no sense for him to exclude g**s, other races or religions...
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 1:50 pm
Pfffft.. B'ullcrap. The Bible also thinks it's an abomination of have your cattle feeding with the wrong kind of cattle. And, for the record, you won't find a quote that says "Men should not marry men." That' s the ironic thing about it...
OTC - July 13, 2014, 1:34 pm
The Bible refers to a man and woman in marriage, not a man and man in marriage , that is stated as an abomination, seems pretty clear.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 9:59 am
My point is that "the spirit" of the bible, and Xtianity, preaches tolerance, unconditional love and acceptance. But you'd have to read between the lines and antiquated text to see that. My hope anyways. Cheers. :-)
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 9:56 am
*read = feed...lol (ah, my smarty pants smartphone auto-corrector)
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 9:55 am
Yes, I agree with the gist of what you are saying. My point was that basis modern law off a dusty 2000 year old book that punishes you with death for how "you read your goats" is not a rock solid basis for how humans should treat each other...
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 9:53 am
The commandments from the Bible also says "Psychics, wizards, and so on are to be stoned to death" and "Don't let cattle graze with other kinds of Cattle" and other laws from 2000 years ago...lol
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 9:53 am
...Same-*** marriage is rejected as un-Christian and immoral on the basis of a myopic reading of a very few Biblical texts. And the texts in question are scant indeed.
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 9:52 am
Actually, TA, the Bible does not clearly endorse one form of marriage over another. The Biblical arguments against same-*** marriage are not proffered from texts that deal with marriage, but from texts that purportedly deal with same-*** orientation...
fauxnews - July 13, 2014, 9:51 am
I said "the bible." I never said "the church". There is a difference. And if I were a Xtian, I wouldn't give a f*** what a group of contemporaries in charge of essentially a politically organization think. Who needs others to tell me what the bible means?
terroraustralis - July 13, 2014, 2:41 am
i'm all for equality, but saying the bible doesnt oppose g** marriage is just plain stupid. if the bible prohibits a couple having *** then its an obvious implication that marriage between them is also prohibited.
fauxnews - July 12, 2014, 8:40 pm
The g** men in the surrounding states that got married never hurt you either. Not one hair on your head. Buildings aren't burning down over it. Baby Jesus isn't crying. See a theme here? More guns have hurt people than any g** marriage ever did. Nuff said
Bandit5906 - July 12, 2014, 8:19 pm
I left ammo next to my gun for a whole month and it never hurt anyone!
fauxnews - July 12, 2014, 8:13 pm
That works too.
Greeny - July 12, 2014, 7:26 pm
I see no vs. here... putting the wrong people behind guns or marriage, it's the same thing


REVELATION 22:11 - Let him who does wrong continue to do wrong; let him who is vile continue to be vile; let him who does right continue to do right... jesus says do not judge, for only god may judge.


TAGS: g**marriage abortion its in revelation
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by terroraustralis

terroraustralis - September 21, 2012, 4:53 am
then american law goes against the bible, which says that the only way god will know if people are g** and should be punished, is if they get married to each other. thats the basic premise... if life is a test, then we're letting them cheat...
loosecannon - September 20, 2012, 2:50 pm
According to most State laws and the DoMA, g** marriage is already illegal. Republicans aren't trying to ban it...
terroraustralis - September 19, 2012, 12:58 am
following the "kill all the queers" passages is like obama followers ignoring his recent failures and saying how great of a president he is going to be.
terroraustralis - September 19, 2012, 12:57 am
i like to follow the philosophy that the most recent updates are the most likely to be correct. its not my fault that the bible contradicts itself multiple times. i tend to follow philosophies that arent self-contradictory, like freedom of speech.
JGalt - September 18, 2012, 6:54 am
I think that is what you just did in your previous quote. Not familiar with the bible quote about not banning g** marriage or abortions. I seem to remember homo***uality being a sin as well as murder. just sayin. you got different quotes to pick from?
terroraustralis - September 18, 2012, 4:00 am
i dont hate christianity, i hate christians who "pick and choose" what bible passages they want to follow and which they ignore.
terroraustralis - September 18, 2012, 3:59 am
in other words, dont try to ban g** marriage, dont try to ban abortions. live by the rules of god but dont impose the rules of god on others. its right there in the bible, and its in the constitution, why is that so hard to understand?
GrouchoMarxist - September 17, 2012, 4:19 pm
It tells us not to cast our pearls before the swine... Thanks for playing.
GrouchoMarxist - September 17, 2012, 4:18 pm
Agreed
arnnatz - September 17, 2012, 10:52 am
It's even funnier when people who hate Christianity post bible quotes
terroraustralis - September 17, 2012, 10:00 am
isnt it funny when your own book tells you to stop imposing its rules on other people?


GAY ANIMALS - Clearly "natural law" does not apply here.


TAGS: g** marriage supreme court equality
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - April 3, 2013, 12:11 am
Aw, I was just tryin' to troll you, man, nothin' personal.
deerbag2 - April 3, 2013, 12:03 am
Come on admit it, you laughed.
Cannabal - April 2, 2013, 11:57 pm
No, that would be Your Mom there, buddy.
deerbag2 - April 2, 2013, 11:42 pm
Is the one on top named Michelle?
PapaFox - April 2, 2013, 8:32 pm
Clearly they must be atheist socialist lions that were born in Kenya! :-D


AN ELECTION DAY REMINDER -




THE GAY MARRIAGE DIVERSION - Diversion - A maneuver that draws the attention of someone away from something else.




Marriage rights unfair to single people not just gays -


TAGS: marriage rights
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

Renza - May 1, 2013, 12:08 pm
why should that be a prerequisite? And does that mean you are also suggesting that sterile heteros shouldn't be able to marry?
OTC - May 1, 2013, 12:03 pm
If same s e x couples can procreate, then they should marry and have the benefits.
Renza - April 29, 2013, 10:33 am
Not actually a requirement
ipaprime - April 29, 2013, 10:29 am
and the minister who presides over the wedding signs the marriage certificate to formaly authenticate the marriage
Ron2 - April 28, 2013, 7:58 am
Yeah, I know. Equal only means equal if it excludes people based on sick interpretation of religious values. Someone always has to be a second class citizen it seems.
Renza - April 28, 2013, 7:55 am
But allowing g** marriage would go against their selective beliefs in their partial interpretation of their religion... cause you know, this country was founded with the intent to become a religious state right?
Ron2 - April 28, 2013, 5:47 am
marriage. If they want to do the traditional lie then we can go back to selling our daughters for cows and goats, providing dowries, forced arranged marriages, male dominated law regarding marriage. Like stone them if they do something you disagree with
Ron2 - April 28, 2013, 5:45 am
Suits have been filed and won with the nine states with common law marriage and vested interest by hetero***ual couples in other states. A marriage holds more water than a POA, medical or otherwise. I fail to see why so many are so against g.a.y.
OTC - April 26, 2013, 4:34 pm
Why segregate between single and married? Or straight, g a y, or polygamists?
crankyhead - April 26, 2013, 1:39 pm
Guys, churches don't perform marriages, they perform weddings. A marriage, is a certificate that you get at the county clerks office. Religion has sweet fk all to do with it.
Renza - April 26, 2013, 12:01 pm
Allowing g** marriage wouldn't force churches (or whatever other religious organization) to perform services, just offers legal viability to the union.
Renza - April 26, 2013, 12:00 pm
Obviously churches can be as discriminate as they want, freedom of religion and all that. I'm saying the laws should simply be expanded to incorporate homos. The actual "marriage" can be religious (as available) or just legal the same as hetero couples.
Oyster - April 26, 2013, 11:47 am
Also, I am out for the day, so I'll check back for your response on Monday, ok?
Oyster - April 26, 2013, 11:46 am
My best friend did it that way, simple and quick at city hall, performed by the mayor.
Oyster - April 26, 2013, 11:45 am
I'm going somewhere with this, obviously. Since you want both, will the next step be to legislate that churches perform the 'marriage'? Or will going to city hall and having a civil union performed be enough?
Renza - April 26, 2013, 10:32 am
A viable reason to argue against differentiating it, is that having two separate policies allows for differing rights/benefits to be provided to the two groups, plus overhead in trying to get politicians to update both simultaneously as needed.
Renza - April 26, 2013, 10:30 am
I've already answered that, equal rights. You however appear to be purposefully evading my question as to why there should even be a re-terming or segregation involved beyond religious or "moral" beliefs...
Oyster - April 26, 2013, 10:11 am
So is it the 'term' you want, or the equal rights?
Renza - April 26, 2013, 8:56 am
Equal rights for all is the core of it, yes. My question however, is why anyone outside of religious belief (which includes "moral" belief) feels the need to differentiate between it, rather than just ending the discrimination and allowing equal access.
Oyster - April 26, 2013, 8:49 am
Give them a civil union. That is their argument, correct? Equal rights for all, correct?
Renza - April 26, 2013, 8:01 am
Why segregate the system between strait or g**? In fact, has anyone ever heard any legitimate reason (aka non religious/"moral" reasoning) to block g**s from equal rights to marry, at all?
StoneTools - April 26, 2013, 7:42 am
Actually, they are. If a man and woman live together without being married, they cannot make life decisions for each other.
Oyster - April 26, 2013, 6:12 am
So give them a civil union with all the legal rights that a married couple has. Problem solved.
Ron2 - April 26, 2013, 5:24 am
As much as this hurts defend liberals... single people are not being denied having their significant other able to make life decisions for them should they need it. Which is a huge part of the benefit of marriage.


SELF EXPLANATORY -




So what do you get when you cross Obama with gay marriage? -




Marriage a right? -


TAGS: marriage
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - April 30, 2013, 8:37 pm
Detroit is in a liberal state, sorry to confuse you. So where were all those liberals from that had time to camp out at occupy wall street instead of being at work?
crankyhead - April 30, 2013, 4:41 pm
Detroit is a state, huh? Interesting premise, you'll have to let me get back to you on that.
OTC - April 30, 2013, 4:33 pm
You mean like Gary In or Detroit Mi for example?
crankyhead - April 29, 2013, 8:35 pm
It's a lot simpler than that OTC. The compassionate liberal blue states just have more people in them who have jobs, or can keep/hold jobs.
Renza - April 29, 2013, 5:35 pm
Abusing the system doesn't mean you're for helping people, fyi.
OTC - April 29, 2013, 12:27 pm
So the red states get the most welfare funding? Guess liberals were telling a lie about how Republicans want to starve the poor. Seems the compassionate liberal blue states would have more welfare funding, who knew?
Renza - April 29, 2013, 8:09 am
Really, you want me to list off tax subsidies involved with capital gains taxation? Sounds like someone has no answer to what non-religious / "moral" argument there is against g** marriage and wants to change the subject.
ipaprime - April 29, 2013, 7:43 am
never said I didn't believe said the theory has some holes that need filling before it has my wholehearted approval
OTC - April 28, 2013, 11:11 pm
Name them
crankyhead - April 28, 2013, 4:23 pm
IPA, I thought you said you didn't believe in evolution?
Renza - April 28, 2013, 10:35 am
Yeah, I'm pretty sure we have enough humans wandering about that a few people reproducing isn't going to cause much depopulation
ipaprime - April 28, 2013, 10:08 am
tho not at present it was a consideration when the population was much smaller
ipaprime - April 28, 2013, 10:07 am
actually part of the problem stems from a primitive part of our minds recognizing that homo***ual behavior is a trait that can be detrimental to the survival of our species
Renza - April 28, 2013, 8:02 am
I know what you mean though, all my money goes to romney's tax subsidies
Renza - April 28, 2013, 7:44 am
Yes, those are two necessary conditions, that while should be safe to a**ume... it really isn't. In any case, people will oppose it anyway if for no better reason than they think it's gross.
Renza - April 28, 2013, 7:42 am
So what you're saying is that you don't have an answer?
ipaprime - April 27, 2013, 11:47 pm
that being said, unless there is a study dealing with long term impact, I see none at this point
ipaprime - April 27, 2013, 11:45 pm
you left 2 important words out of your question. adult and consenting.
crankyhead - April 27, 2013, 8:10 pm
OTC, if that's true, then why are the top ten states that receive the most welfare funding, all republican voting, conservative, red states?
OTC - April 27, 2013, 7:44 pm
Dude, someone has to work to pay for all the deadbeat entitlement grabbing liberals, sorry if I can't respond immediately. So, you want to discrimminate against a live-in girlfriend and other single people while giving rights to one select group of people
Renza - April 27, 2013, 3:37 pm
Clearly the g** community should make a point to keep these updated if conservatives are that intent on restricting their rights. Also, it's spelled "legally" just fyi. Still doesn't answer the question that opponents always refuse to answer.
ipaprime - April 27, 2013, 8:24 am
the med decision part is easy. it is called a living will. it says who is LEAGALY responsible for making those decisions
Renza - April 26, 2013, 1:11 pm
So, is it that you don't intend to try to answer my question, or that there just isn't an answer?
Renza - April 26, 2013, 1:11 pm
Sure, one example is that homo partners currently are basically double taxed on inheritance from their dead spouse. Another example is the inability to make medical decisions in the case that the partner is incapacitated.
OTC - April 26, 2013, 12:25 pm
What benefits are more difficult or not applicable?
Renza - April 26, 2013, 7:38 am
Tax breaks I can see, as that's applicable to individuals, some benefits are a lot more difficult or not applicable to give to an individual rather than a couple though. In the end though, what legit argument does anyone have against g** marriage?
OTC - April 25, 2013, 9:41 pm
So people who decide not to marry, shouldn't they have the same rights? Why just being married does one get the benefits? Singles should get the same tax breaks, etc. as married people.
Renza - April 25, 2013, 6:10 pm
Actually, that's what is already being done, rights are being given to hetero***uals and taken from homo***uals. That is what needs to change. Besides, if you're a law abiding citizen, with no history of mental illness, your rights are not impacted.
OTC - April 25, 2013, 4:28 pm
Wrong, I'm equating rights and principles. You want to give rights to one group of people while taking rights away from another group of people.
Renza - April 25, 2013, 12:04 pm
Nice use of subtlety in dodging the question... You're equating stockpiling an arsenal to g** or polygamist marriage. But to answer your question, my only real concern would be that ya come across as being a bit wound up, other than that, stockpile away
OTC - April 25, 2013, 11:47 am
Why should it matter to anyone if I want to own several a**ault weapons?
PapaFox - April 24, 2013, 11:37 pm
Do I take it that you want to go back to the time that inter-racial marriage was illegal?
Renza - April 24, 2013, 9:35 pm
Here's a much more important question. Why should anyone care if a small group of people want to go and marry each other? What possible impact could that have on anyone outside of that group?
OTC - April 24, 2013, 7:18 pm
Dude, g a y marriage is illegal, but liberals want to change that. Be careful what you ask for
OTC - April 24, 2013, 7:15 pm
Liberals are in favor of same-*** marriage, so not necessarily more than one wife. Maybe some one has 1 female and 2 male best friends, shouldn't that person be able to marry all 3? Afterall, liberals claim marriage is a union between friends.
PapaFox - April 24, 2013, 7:12 pm
Well, if your honestly curious, why not look it up? Maybe start with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygamy_in_North_America#Polygamy_and_bigamy_laws_in_the_US
OTC - April 24, 2013, 7:00 pm
I thought liberals were all about hooking up at protest rallies, don't need to be married for that.
Doggit - April 24, 2013, 6:43 pm
Polygamy is illegal because any guy that wants more than one wife is certifiable and needs to committed.
Renza - April 24, 2013, 5:30 pm
Same reason interracial marriage was illegal and g** marriage is still illegal I would a**ume. Someone basically said "ew gross" and others agreed.
OTC - April 24, 2013, 5:18 pm
If marriage is a right, then why is polygamy illegal?
Renza - April 24, 2013, 4:36 pm
No idea why it's illegal... couldn't really care less how many people want to marry each other.
PapaFox - April 24, 2013, 3:43 pm
A bit silly, since polygamy is illegal in the United States. And marriage IS a fundamental right as reflected in a number of Supreme Court cases going back over 100 years.


Society benefits from traditional marriage -




PUBLIC UNIONS - There's only one that I'll support.




A little Civics lesson -


TAGS: equality for all g** marriage
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by Jamison12

RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:17 am
Don't care for her but on this she is correct
Cannabal - May 6, 2014, 2:24 pm
I missed you, too, fox.
foxrecon19d - May 6, 2014, 8:44 am
Nah... I knew you'd be back. It IS an election year, after all...
Cannabal - May 5, 2014, 9:34 pm
Let's see here, g** marriage, g** marriage, AH! Here, I found it for you. Ninth Amendment and Establishment Clause of the First Amendment forbidding religious doctrine from influencing the law. Did you miss me, fox, cause I know you did.
foxrecon19d - May 5, 2014, 5:35 pm
You made your point J. And you did it effectively. That is all this site asks. We can disagree. But we will do it as friends and rivals (emphasis on friends) Welcome to politifake
Jamison12 - May 5, 2014, 4:51 pm
Thanks haha, I'm not a frequent viewer of her show but I saw this excerpt, but with context, that is a little crazy haha
foxrecon19d - May 5, 2014, 3:43 pm
however, if one ignores the source of the message, and looks only at the message, this is a pretty d*** good poster. 5Ls
foxrecon19d - May 5, 2014, 3:41 pm
Normally, I would agree. Except Ms.Maddow has still to find 'right to g** marriage' in the bill of rights. The context of which she is speaking, Ms. Maddow is equating rights with entitlement mentality


Marriage exists to safeguard children -




KENTUCKY - "I now pronounce you husband and wife."




Just another "pretty" face of the Democrat Party... -




NEWSFLASH FOR THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT -




REDEFINING MARRIAGE - As long as we are redefining marriage, why stop at one- bring back polygamy. How about marrying cousins, family, etc. while we're doing all this social re-engineering stuff?




Marriage -




SERIOUSLY -




Gay Marriage -


TAGS: g** marriage lgbt freedom liberty
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

KaBoom - June 11, 2013, 1:28 pm
Thats what I mean. Gun stores are FFL holders. Make every arms-length deal go through one.Obviously the gun store cannot do anything for inheritance because the previous owner is dead.Although we could create a law where they could do it with a death cert
Renza - June 11, 2013, 1:22 pm
I see nothing wrong with compromise, though I'm not really a lawmaker. Though a side note, to my understanding, numerous gun stores could actually facilitate the documentation and background checks already, though I'm sure a fee would be involved.
KaBoom - June 11, 2013, 1:20 pm
support checks if they are "arms-length" deals. Effectively making it to where any firearm sold would go through an FFL (closing the "gun show loophole"), but I would still be able to give/sell to family or friends without being a criminal. Deal? lol
KaBoom - June 11, 2013, 1:13 pm
It depends on the implementation. The way the new "assault weapon" ban bill reads, ANY private transaction would be precluded because regular people don't know how to conduct these checks and keep these records appropriately. Can we compromise? I would...
Renza - June 11, 2013, 8:44 am
Background checks already exist in most states, it's just the areas that it doesn't that cause loopholes, closing those up wouldn't be much of a stepping stone for outright confiscation of guns
Cannabal - June 10, 2013, 8:59 pm
Keep in mind that the NSA has been around since the Cold War.
KaBoom - June 10, 2013, 7:52 pm
I am not talking about a speculative and nebulous "the government." I am saying there are real people right here right now that explicitly want to squelch gun rights and they will use something like that as a start.
Renza - June 10, 2013, 7:23 pm
Yes, there are always people who think anything and everything that involves the government is another step towards totalitarian fascist rule, but at least on this subject congress aside, there is a vast majority in favor of moving forward on the matter
StoneTools - June 10, 2013, 7:12 pm
and that is becoming more and more clear as the unconstitutional domestic spying unfolds for this administration and the previous one as well. Who knows what took place in the administrations prior to Bush.
KaBoom - June 10, 2013, 2:32 pm
I dont have a problem with that conceptually, but you have to admit that there are a ton of people who would consider this just "a foot in the door" to other measures.It is the same argument for the regulation of abortion.Nullification through regulation.
Renza - June 10, 2013, 8:10 am
Point behind that being, people really overestimate how private their private information really is. Anyone who really want's access probably already has it unfortunately.
Renza - June 10, 2013, 8:03 am
HIPAA regulations are followed surprisingly poorly, at least in some circumstances... one of the people I work with transport medical records, bank information, credit card info etc, via unlocked external HDDs through the us postal service...
StoneTools - June 9, 2013, 6:01 pm
I don't think even that is authorized by HIPAA(sp?) but laws never stopped the government before. Besides it starts with dangerously unstable and moves on to "Did you serve in the military?"
Renza - June 9, 2013, 5:51 pm
There you go, no invasion of privacy, just the confidential holder of the medical records generically saying they have no medical reason to think person A is a danger to society.
Renza - June 9, 2013, 5:50 pm
Well, that brings up 2 thoughts, first - clearly they already have access if they want given this prism bs and whatever else we dont yet know about. second - who's to say the medical portion can't be limited to "yes or no, are they dangerously unstable?"
StoneTools - June 9, 2013, 5:46 pm
I believe in doctor-patient confideniality and don't want my personal information disclosed to some pimple faced government worker
StoneTools - June 9, 2013, 5:45 pm
No, I'm arguing about how ignorant your statement was in #56549. I don't think I like the idea of the government having access to confidential medical records. After all, they don't have a very good track record of keeping secrets, now do they?
Renza - June 9, 2013, 5:40 pm
So, you're arguing the validity of universal background checks by (what I hope is intentional) failure to understand how it works? Having a background check is showing. No effort required by the purchaser.
StoneTools - June 9, 2013, 5:35 pm
Your statement was: "...gun nuts being terrified of having to show they're not criminals..." Shouldn't it be the place of the government to prove they are criminals instead?
Renza - June 9, 2013, 4:38 pm
where exactly is the issue in showing whether you have a criminal record or a history of violent mental illness prior to purchasing a tool who's sole purpose in existence is to kill things?
StoneTools - June 9, 2013, 4:05 pm
see your comment #56531 above
Cannabal - June 9, 2013, 3:21 pm
The ones making the most noise about this are the Religious Right, who insist on a narrow definition of marriage that does not appear even in their own scripture. And let's not forget the DOMA legislation which was written by closet homo***uals, too.
Renza - June 9, 2013, 2:29 pm
The gun control matter isn't saying whether you are A or B, it's asking for legal verification as to which you are. Seems pretty strait forward. Back to the issue of equal rights, whats wrong with equality.
StoneTools - June 9, 2013, 1:46 pm
That shows how ignorant the whole gun control crap is. I believe the law is that you are innocent until proven guilty, not you are guilty until proven innocent.
Renza - June 9, 2013, 10:38 am
the description you're providing sounds more like gun nuts being terrified of having to show they're not criminals or criminally insane when buying a gun. Though I guess I can see how one may think this way if they aren't for equal rights and what not.
foxrecon19d - June 9, 2013, 8:14 am
Such as in the United States of America, where homo***uality is such a non-issue that it must be MADE an issue by homo***uals seeking attention for themselves...


BIBLICAL MARRIAGE - NOT EXACTLY AS ADVERTISED -


TAGS: biblical marriage was bizarre
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - March 29, 2013, 10:40 am
Well, we already knew that conservatives devalue women to the point of objects, support going back to 'the good old days of slavery', and find ra** to be overall acceptable - or at least tolerable. Guess this just kinda gives more insight as to why.
PapaFox - March 29, 2013, 5:45 am
For a LOL, watch ... http://youtu.be/OFkeKKszXTw


DIRTY HARRY ON MARRIAGE EQUALITY -




CONSERVATIVES - They believe in the Defense of Marriage Act, even though it was supported by adulterers like these guys.




IOW, GO JUMP IN THE LAKE -


TAGS: marriage equality
Rating: 2.78/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Curlyrocks - April 2, 2013, 9:45 pm
And if you don't like coffee grown by slaves also feel free to sell you Starbucks stock (I hate companies that try to look socially conscious but aren't)


BIBLICAL MARRIAGE - Not as simple as it seems.


TAGS: marriage equality
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - April 2, 2013, 8:42 am
A lot of people do sadly take the bible literally... though usually only the parts they like or agree with. Then again plenty of people call it a me***hor but still judge people for not following it...
Rudedog - April 1, 2013, 7:57 pm
Do people still take the Bible literally? No, it's to be used for selective non culpible discrimination.
Cannabal - March 31, 2013, 4:21 pm
Solomon was probably the greatest pimp of all time.


FAMILY VALUES COME IN DIFFERENT FLAVORS -




SO CONSERVATIVES - When can we vote on YOUR wedding?




HEADLINES -




The Teabag Party Narrative -


TAGS: fox news same *** marriage
Rating: 2.07/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

EmmaRoydes - June 7, 2014, 9:33 am
They will do anything to get the focus away from all the scandals that have erupted. It's the crankyhead "Look, a squirrel" routine - finely honed by liberals and their operatives. I smell desperation.
foxrecon19d - June 7, 2014, 9:22 am
Hmmm..The Taliban says that they will redouble their efforts to kidnap Americans since Obama's secret negotiations freed five Taliban leaders. Let's see what the Obama supporters are going to do to focus the narrative on the Tea Party...


EQUALITY, WHAT A CONCEPT -




WHY CONSERVATIVES THINK WE SHOULDN'T RUIN THE "SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE": - Newt Gingrich can do that all on his own!




Progressive Hypocrisy -




Liberal Lunacy -




Democrat Constitution Denier -




One Man, One Woman. -




i'm Married To Hillary? -




Thomas Jefferson -




The Donald -




Are the same RepubliKKKlan men -


TAGS: gingrich rudy trump hillary marriages
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - October 3, 2016, 6:16 pm
Speculation backed by a lack of evidence And you are saying in the same breath that Rudy and Trump's attacks against his women "victims" over the years are NOT "vicious"? Good luck with that.
Olympusmanager - October 3, 2016, 5:56 pm
Seriously? It wasn't the marraige, it was the viscious attacks launced on the victims by Hillary. Champion of Womens' Rights? HA!


Yet, wants to criticize others for their marriages. -


TAGS: gingrich rudy trump marriage cheating
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Bandit5906 - October 4, 2016, 6:36 pm
KKK part of the disgusting Ovomitbots!


Supreme Hypocrisy -




If We Really Did Have Equal “Rights” In America -


TAGS: equal rights america g** marriage wedding cake confederate rebel flag southerners g** lobby
Rating: 4.56/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - June 30, 2015, 10:38 pm
Suddenly redneck racists are a minority class that needs protection?(lol) Yeah,this is about "cake rights." The big difference:those Southerners once(and still would)fought for the right to take away another rights.G.ays aren't taking away anyones rights


Liberals -




Now kindly STFU -




Conservative Majority Supreme Court rules in favor of Gay Marriage -




How you like dem apples? -


TAGS: g** marriage confederate flag priests
Rating: 4.06/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

mittromney - July 19, 2015, 3:37 pm
/The railroad ~aka my job ~ calls. Got my internet fix, got2run. That's all folks!/Maybe I will see you peepers in a few weeks, hopefully with a new account ~ hopefully with a proper name, and not Mitt the twit. ~peACe~lOVe~reSPEct~Quinn/
mittromney - July 19, 2015, 3:32 pm
/you made some funny f**ing posters RebeccaO. haHAHa Sorry to see ya'go. Hopefully you read this./I know some are happy to see you go, but when a contributing member leaves,the loss is everybody’s. The adults here appreciated you. Happy trails, Rebecca~Q/


Gay Marriage is Constitutional -




After all... -


TAGS: isis bush cheney hypocrisy g** marriage
Rating: 4.05/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Darntootin66 - October 11, 2015, 4:24 pm
But you all agree they exist and they are threatening to destabilize the region. What do you think goes on at those World Leader Confrences.....F ominoes?
fauxnews - June 20, 2015, 2:14 pm
That's partisan political spin, mate. The Bush/Cheney illegal war has so badly destabilized that region that they are squarely to blame for the horrors being spawned by that region.
Cyberhagen - June 20, 2015, 1:05 pm
There was no ISIS when these guys left office, and wasn't for a few more years. They didn't create Al Quaeda either, that preexisted them.. you want to blame Bill for that one?


Republican Logic -


TAGS: bruno g** marriage supreme court
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 6, 2015, 6:35 pm

OK guys, Let's drop this for now. MMess, no one accused you of anything here, you are mixing up 2 different issues.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 4:36 pm
It was to show how low you dead tree trolls will stoop to get your way and to let you people know how easy it is to disprove false allegations
mittromney - July 6, 2015, 2:47 pm
,so you are just being self-conscious/sounds like you know how the system works inside and out,which means you’d also know the loop holes-like a hacker would.Hmmm,that doesn’t sound suspicious.guilty much?do everyone a favor - learn some online etiquette/
mittromney - July 6, 2015, 2:46 pm
/why are you filing this kind of complaint in public when that’s what the report function and pm utility is for?To put on a show,of course.Like the rest of us wanna f**ing see your dirty laundry.I dont see anyone here publicly accusing you of "false PMs”,
mittromney - July 6, 2015, 2:44 pm
/wtf?! holy online bar brawl Batman!/some say train wrecks are still fascinating to watch.also thought that's the world's biggest load of crap,gather the man who coined the phrase never actually saw a train wreck in person before.nothin'fascinating there/
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 2:09 pm
You too :)
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 2:06 pm
P.S. I noticed you hadn't gotten to my PMs. Hence, all this; in my attempt to get a hold of you. Disregard 'em, basically says the same thing already said here in triplicate....Glad you're sticking around, mate.Have a good one Rebecca :-)
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 2:02 pm
For a moment there, I almost grabbed a smoke, and I haven't smoked for years. So how could I ever tease you for it? It's all good. I'm a happy girl now. A community of good loyal friends FTMFW ... Cheers, Faux :)
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 1:59 pm
That's a relief. Who else could I count on to keep me honest as I continue to quit smoking ;-) Seriously...glad you're gonna stay part of our Politifake family, dysfunctional as it it. We need our Denmother, tigeress,etc. Cheers, mate :-)
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 1:55 pm
...or as Starlord might say,clusterf**k,of too much at once.Inadvertent of not,all cards are out on the table.Should make for a more peaceful place,which is all I care about.Dont worry-I plan to stick around,feet planted.Thanks for the kind words,Faux :D
rebeccaolsen - July 6, 2015, 1:51 pm
You had me at Groot. :) Seriously tho - Don't worry doll, the others changed my mind too. The out-flowing of support was very touching.Here and in private. In my defense, cliche as it sounds, I was a little PMS'y. Just a bad confluence...
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 1:45 pm
Can others,especially those others that used to gun for us,say the same? Of course not.That means something!In other words,you must be doing SOMETHING right.Hold onto that during tough times.Besides,Zeit even changed his avatar to Groot for you X-D (2/2)
fauxnews - July 6, 2015, 1:41 pm
Come on Rebecca, don't leave us. Moo's a good guy, and you know it, he's just doing his job (he's hands are just tied). The occasional derpery can make anyone a little crazy here. What matters we're still here, long and strong,after all this time(1/2)
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 9:51 am
The PHPBB logs are stored in the MySQL database and are accessible via the Control Panel.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 9:44 am
false PMs. You can narrow it down by using the dates and times on the fake PMs that were sent to you.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 6, 2015, 9:43 am
Mooooooo, I would suggest that you ask the owners of the site to go to the PHPBB logs and search them for any PM that I have sent to anyone on this site. You will find there was only 2 sent - both to you. After that, you can ban the perpetrators of the
Zeitguy - July 5, 2015, 7:24 pm
Glad y'all worked things out Starlord and Sir.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:55 pm
[#77780] haha. No worries, Moo. Again, crossposting. it was how I was raised - I was a military brat. Weirds me out too when I hear myself say that, blame it on pathological bu.ttkissing of authority drilled into me by a strict father. ^_^ Have a good one
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:52 pm
[#77778] And thank you for the clarification, sir. And to be clear, I meant no disrespect for your authority. Nor was I trying to go over your head. Truthfully, deep down inside I always trust you know what you are doing. Thank you for moderating the site
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:52 pm

I've been on this network for over 6 years, I'm used to it. Just please stop calling me "sir". It weirds me out.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:48 pm
[#77772 ,#77774,] Yeah, cross posting is a real b*tch. It's like we are debating over a temporal time continuum like different versions of the Terminator. ^_^ I didn't know about the banned member,and the cross posting further changes the meaning of posts
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:48 pm

I get what you're trying to say and to be clear I wasn't trying to upset Rebecca.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:45 pm
If you are able to sort out the cross posting, you will see my intentions are noble.Thank you for your ear. Take it easy Moo+17o's sir. ^_^
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:43 pm
I respect you too much Moo, sir, and Rebecca to not step in. You both make good points. I just everyone to get along. I respect you both too much to be dishonest with you. It's a colossal misunderstanding turning into a cluster f*ck
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:42 pm
-you weren't aware of MMess false accusations of meat/sockpuppetting with his repeated tag-team troll attacks, that certainly changes everything.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:41 pm

Think about this... I have actually banned a member for retaliating against another member who I had just banned hours earlier for the initial attack. REPORT your problems, 2 wrongs don't make a right.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:41 pm
4. As far as Rebecca, or the rest of us go, most of us have thick skins. It's not that - I don't consider the word "crap" rude. It's the way the whole situation was handled with a lack of empathy toward all the facts of the case. But if you are saying-
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:39 pm

no problem, we're typing all over each other.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:39 pm
#77769 was in response to #77765. We were cross posting, so ignore the lag, it will change the meaning.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:38 pm

If you guys bothered to report problems or PM them to me your issues with certain members would be settled a lot faster, instead most of you attack or break rules and end up getting yourselves in trouble.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:36 pm
My apologies. I didn't realize you wrote this when I typed #77766 and #77767. I hate the comment boards the way they work, lag and all. I will PM you the links to MMess's "dead tree troll" sock/meatpuppet false accusations. Disregard my other comments
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:35 pm

compared to the way all of you talk to each other using the word "crap" is hardly rude, and this is not even close to the firs time I've had to ask Rebecca to stop.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:34 pm
-if MMess is truly a newbie, then he at least has an agenda as demonstrated with this fixation on FN. Admonishing a veteran member but being silent with a newbie would embarrass anyone into possible exile.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:33 pm
3. How is Rebecca supposed to be feel comfortable sticking around when you rudely admonish her in a public setting while being silent when MMess is on the rampage. I wouldn't want to stick around either-
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:33 pm

PM me links to this "dead tree troll" evidence and I'll review it. (you guys realize I'm a volunteer and cannot possibly read EVERY comment, right?)
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:31 pm
2.An accusation of meatpuppeting is accusing multiple members of working behind-the-scenes to use multiple accounts to harass a known member. Yet no one has publicly admonished MMess for making those false accusations of which he has no proof beyond doubt
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:30 pm

In regards to "handling this privately". I've done that to death, to no avail. In regards to us "knowing" that there are sock poppets...If we could PROVE it they'd be banned. Our hands are tied unless you'd like us to start banning people without evidence
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 6:28 pm
1. With all due respect, Moo sir [sounds funny when I say it like that], EMMess has made repeated false accusations of meat-puppetting with his repeated tag team dead tree troll attack, which is in the same class of sockpuppeting accusations
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:24 pm

That being said, no one is asking Rebecca to leave, if she does that is her own choice.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:23 pm

..... to PM it to one of the moderation team.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:23 pm

I have had this same debate time and time again with both sides on this site and it never seems to sink in, DO NOT accuse other members of socking in comments or the forum. If you have Proof (not just belief) that someone is a sock puppet feel free...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 6:20 pm

We have been very clear about the accusations of sock puppeting. If one of you can prove those accusations to me without a doubt we will take action, but you cannot. The same rules apply to both sides.
Zeitguy - July 5, 2015, 5:54 pm
Are kidding me? I thought this was forum that allowed for truthful debate without spineless moderator intervention. Now we lose a thoughtful contributor because she correctly called out a known troll.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:54 pm
finally, typo3 *#77752"It is SORELY [not solely] needed at these forums." :::and I don't have a good excuse, I'm hungover from a clam bake the night before and can't spell worth sH*t today:::
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:49 pm
also, typo2 *#77753 "Wild spirits, like some wild horses, are not meant to BE broken."
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:21 pm
now for my typos heh *#77749 "A person would be lying if they DIDN'T acknowledge it."
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:16 pm
Bye Rebeccaolsen. Wild spirits, like some horses, are not meant to broken. Happy trails tigress. ^_^
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:14 pm
Take care Rebecca. You and your valuable POV, no matter how out there, will be missed - it is solely needed at these forums which are often time overwhelmed by a virulent conservative POV that bullies away the liberal members. Good luck in your endeavors.
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:13 pm
-that's at least a serious violation of this forum, and you can hardly blame those provoked by his agenda and trolling strategy. Okay, now I will get off my soapbox.^_^
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:11 pm
-then MMessEnnBeeCee has easily failed that. At least he is as deserving of public admonishment as well. I do not agree that Rebecca or anyone should be the strawman or, even worse, the scapegoat. EMma likes to provoke others into an "emotional response"-
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:09 pm
-other veteran members have acknowledged it here and elsewhere. A person would be lying if they'd acknowledge it.If it's true the admins know of previous banned trolls returning to this forum but allow it "as long as they comport to the best of behavior"-
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:07 pm
I acknowledge I may get into trouble speaking my mind as well, but the situation is all the more threatening when, ironic as it is, EMma clearly is THAT "Emma" everyone loathes and suffers now and again. He/she doesn't try to hide it-
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:05 pm
MMessEnnBeeCee has at least has been as guilty as any one here of disruptive behavior deserving of a public admonishment, which would be embarrassing for anyone. With all due respect, it represents a double standard which robs an environment of fairness
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 3:01 pm
With all due respect,to the powers that be,I respectfully disagree with publicly admonishing BEcca for calling MmEssEnBeCee "EMma".Not to mention the tone was rude.I expect grown up behavior from our mods.It could not have been handled privately with her?
guest818 - July 5, 2015, 2:56 pm
That's a shame BEcca. :( Wish there's something I could say to make you stay but I gather you are sworn to your conviction.Can hardly blame you though,considering what you've been through.Sent you my email and Fb link in a private message - stay in touch
OTC - July 5, 2015, 2:56 pm
Doesn't matter who he might be, you should address him as who he is. I doubt liberals are still addressing Catilyn as Bruce
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:45 pm
typo: same people = same "person" (sorry, texting one handed here. Bye everyone! It was fun. Will send some of you my email in a PM so we can keep in touch.Take care Politifakers. Happy trails) :D
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:36 pm
Everyone should check and compare the posts of those trolls I listed and then you tell me in good conscience they are not the same people. Sorry you all have to suffer that sociopath. Not my problem anymore. Bye all :)
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:35 pm
And for everyone else new to this drama, Moo has a thing for a vicious troll named Arnnatz who he thinks was unfairly banned despite his completely inappropriately behavior. Since then Arnnatz has been back as another user named StoneTools and Emmaroydes
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:32 pm
Or you can ban me because your ego comes first even though I dare to be honest about something on everyone's mind, that harms us all. Either way this is my last post. Bye Politifake.
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 2:30 pm
How about I do you one better and I leave, Moo. You and I both know MMessEnnBeeCee is EmmaRoydes. But once again you selfishly plan to make the entire forum suffer for the sake of your need to enable that troll. I can't tell you to stop the enabling crap.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 5, 2015, 2:18 pm

Stop with the EMMa crap.
rebeccaolsen - July 5, 2015, 11:50 am
Awww, is that what you think? Adorable :) If "wishful thinking" (read: projecting) helps you cope with the public shame of being a coward after you blew it, then I'm glad I could help. Does that mean you're now finished with your month-long tantrum EMMa?
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 5, 2015, 9:55 am
You are right, never go to a link I post since, like last time, it will blow your argument out of the water. It's cowardly to act that way, but completely expected of you.
rebeccaolsen - July 4, 2015, 5:52 pm
Funny you mention that doll.Where I am at,they do this lovely Lexington beer flight of red,white and blue ale.I leave fireworks & demolitions duty to my significant other,I just spring for the ear plugs.Off 2 enjoy some festivities. Take care, Starlord :)
guest818 - July 4, 2015, 5:44 pm
pwned ... 5Ls on the comeback. Good memories are a radical Republican's worst enemy. Just ask Jeb Bush ^_^ ... btw, Happy 4th Becca! drink plenty of Red, White and Blue ale, if they make such a thing. And blow up lots of stuff - fireworks rock! Take care
rebeccaolsen - July 4, 2015, 5:31 pm
ts;dr :D *I don't click your links. Many of us long ago made an agreement not to, remember? How is that campaign to ignore me working out for you?* noodlespines FTL
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 4, 2015, 2:56 pm
http://variety.com/2015/biz/news/republican-role-marriage-equality-1201531880/


Antonin Scalia -


TAGS: antonin scalia supreme court justice g** marriage dissent
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - June 28, 2015, 1:19 pm
Nope. He actually DID say that - quote@Scalia pg.6- "Not a single South Westerner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California doesn't count.)" http://documents.latimes.com/supreme-court-rules-g**-marriage/#document/p74/a224855
Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:12 pm
While the overall sentiment has some legal merit, I rather doubt he said "California does not count"; I'm also pretty sure he knows how to spell "partisan".


attack on Cruz control -




On Gay Marriage, Cue GOP crybaby whining -


TAGS: g** marriage boehner supreme court
Rating: 3.97/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - June 28, 2015, 1:13 pm
Well...not according to the conservative majority Supreme court. And - not according to their Constitution. So, No, it is not about redefining marriage - "They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The 'Constitution' grants them that right."
Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:27 pm
But they already had the same rights. Survival benefits, shared ownership, tax breaks, etc. through Domestic Partnerships and Civil Unions. This was never really about "equal rights", it was about redefining marriage. Whatever.


S C A L I A -


TAGS: scalia supreme g** marriage dissent
Rating: 3.97/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - June 30, 2015, 6:49 pm
You do realize that you continue to prove my point with your response.?
ipaprime - June 30, 2015, 9:01 am
and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups. Another definition of race. That makes 2 out of around 16.
ipaprime - June 30, 2015, 9:00 am
. a classification of modern humans, sometimes, esp. formerly, based on an arbitrary selection of physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape,
ipaprime - June 30, 2015, 8:55 am
Considering there is only 1 human race and not several, I do believe you are the 1 needing a clue.
Zeitguy - June 29, 2015, 10:57 pm
Racist: race : to dash, run, hurry: suffix ist: one that performs specified action, so therefor based on your logic...... Semantics, recognized by most people with a clue Ipa.
fauxnews - June 29, 2015, 12:14 pm
Cheers Ipa :-)
fauxnews - June 29, 2015, 12:14 pm
However, as long as others recognize that hated of others based on ***ual orientation is as a bad as racism, then I could care less what "word" is used.Hopefully this isn't another Republican denier argument - "g.ay hate NO exist and IS STUPID.derp!"(2/2)
fauxnews - June 29, 2015, 12:11 pm
Well, I was asking Cyberhagen. I wanted to know why HE thought the word was "stupid." But if you are going to answer for him (lol), then - I never denied, linguistically, that the word is slang or even sloppy (read: borderline derogatory) (1/2)
ipaprime - June 29, 2015, 9:45 am
there for homophobia means a fear of humanity.
ipaprime - June 29, 2015, 9:45 am
-phobia; a combining form meaning “fear,” occurring in loanwords from Greek
ipaprime - June 29, 2015, 9:43 am
Homo;(italics) the genus of bipedal primates that includes modern humans and several extinct forms, distinguished by their large brains and a dependence upon tools.
fauxnews - June 28, 2015, 1:05 pm
Why is it stupid? Explain.
Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:08 pm
"Homophobic".. possibly the most stupid term ever coined, but widely used in the 21st century.


Kids react to gay marriage ruling -


TAGS: kids g** marriage supreme court
Rating: 3.92/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

rebeccaolsen - July 4, 2015, 4:30 pm
So is that your excuse, kiddo? :-D Thank you for the clarification
Cyberhagen - July 4, 2015, 1:29 pm
Kids say anything their parents have raised them to say, and that's true of either ideology, right or left.


An easy Republican Button to push -


TAGS: g** marriage supreme court
Rating: 3.83/5

More politifakes by guest818

rebeccaolsen - July 2, 2015, 12:08 am
There is no tabloid or opinion pieces cited in this politifake,which was clearly meant as a joke. In fact, you are the only one who EVER tries to pass off that junk as proof of your "arguments." So you're making fun of yourself,good one. Echolaliafail FTL
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 11:49 pm
looks like when you pu.sh his bu.ttons, out comes the tabloids like clockwork - opinion pieces that mean as much in the way of evidence as my mailman's views on animal control. #sourcefails


T r i f e c t a ! -




And now Gay marriage is upheld as constitutional -


TAGS: supreme confederate g** marriage obamacare
Rating: 3.8/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Cyberhagen - June 28, 2015, 12:25 pm
It was a Democrat symbol. But revisionist history, y' know, next they won't be able to show it in textbooks. I'm not a big fan of the thing, being that I'm a northerner, but the whole thing is just blown out of proportion.


Hey, Republicans... -


TAGS: g** marriage obamacare supreme court
Rating: 3.79/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Dwydwyyr - September 4, 2015, 10:25 am
This needs to be updated, to say "rough year." lol ... You still on vacation, FN? You are missing out on all the fun! As long as Trump is running for Prez, this is the Golden Age of Conservatardism. Won't get better than this.
Zeitguy - June 27, 2015, 9:12 pm
That pic makes me giggle.


A Supreme Court decision is the law of the land -


TAGS: supreme court texas attorney general g** marriage
Rating: 3.66/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 4:24 pm
lol
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:23 pm
Anytime ^_^ To be honest, you are a little bit out there - so I don't agree with everything you say,FN. But on this,you are on point ...Plus,nothing is more amusing than watching you push EMma's bu.ttons - seems like all you have to do is show up. Cheers
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 4:19 pm
Thank you for the shout out, Guest :-)(#77581) Cheers
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 4:13 pm
Sry,but I still DGAF.So what if you're embarrassed you blew it?How's that my prob?You'll never get me 2 agree with you,or join you in your dishonesty.Whining to me isnt gonna change anything...Let us know when you actually decide to"move along" Cheers :-)
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:59 pm
In the meanwhile, you might want to get some aloe for your nostrils. They must be burning ^.^ Too bad they don't have aloe for your burning temper - those b***.ons are red ho.t today
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:53 pm
of course citizens have the democratic right to protest laws.But whiners like Wallace or Paxton dont have the right to defy law,they were hired to administer the laws of the land.So they need to GTFO.You're too busy projecting to see the point of the meme
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:51 pm
[#77578] The poster is right on the $$$ actually. Again, the poster isn't arguing that the constitution doesn't change. Nor is it arguing that citizen shouldn't protest law. It is ridiculing govt officials like Governor Wallace and Ken Paxton.
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:48 pm
i noticed that as well, apparently so have the others.
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 3:47 pm
this pi.ssed you off so badly that you vomited coffee thru your nose? So much for saying it didn't push your bu.ttons^.^... You go around lecturing others as if you are in a position of authority,when really you are just a troll with a persecution complex
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 3:35 pm
I blew nothing. Your poster is pure BS. Especially the STFU comment.As I stated, if people did that, the Volstead Act or Prohibition, it would still be the "Law of the Land".
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 3:34 pm
I just blew coffee thru my nose after reading your comment. Pretending to be a mod? Where in the hell did that crap come from?
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 2:33 pm
ain't no thang :)
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 2:28 pm
Thank you for being generous with your toys, Rebecca, and sharing EMma with the rest of us ^_^
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 1:32 pm
Cheers :)
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 1:31 pm
Thank you for the kind words, Becca. I must be doing SOMETHING right,mate; I haven't gotten a cigarette joke from you lately. ;-) Cheers
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 1:29 pm
Great poster Faux. 5 "ferocious"(lol) Lions. :-D Well ya kinda nailed that one!
rebeccaolsen - July 1, 2015, 1:26 pm
Yea! Our lolcow is back! :-D And here I was worrying for nothing that I had broken our favorite 'toy-MMess-doll' the last time we played. Silly me :)
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:51 pm
That's clearly the point of the poster, and mine.No one here's arguing ga.y marriage wont be overturned one day or that the constitution doesnt change over time.That's your warped reading because you're too busy projecting.Your bu.ttons do that to ya ^_^
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:47 pm
of course the average voter has the democratic right to protest laws.But whiners like George Wallace or Ken Paxton dont have the right to defy law, they were hired to administer the laws of the land.So they need to GTFO and get a different job or STFU
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:39 pm
yeah, yeah, yeah - this is pushing your bu.ttons and you are too insecure to be honest about it. Got the memo, thanks.I don't care about any of that.THE POINT I DO CARE ABOUT - this poster is referring to government officials, not the average citizen
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 12:35 pm
Well, thank ya Zeit and Guest. Thawnk yuz vury mutch. *in my best worst Elvis voice* ;-) Cheers
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 12:30 pm
I second that, Zeit! ^_^ 5Ls on your comments Fauxnews.[#77561,#77562,#77563] That was a work of art, FN - PWNing as poetry. Magnificent.
Zeitguy - July 1, 2015, 12:18 pm
I love when Trolls get called out!
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 12:14 pm
because I have enough sense not to debate a fool trolling me.However,your history of pointing out“other’s ignorance"(on the other hand)has only backfired on you historically.So go for it.Knock yourself out-ironically,you do so anyways LITERALLY X-D Cheers
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 12:02 pm
(#77560)And,again,nothin'you're saying(or have said)will change the facts that(A)you"blew it"and(B)that I plan to remain a member here :-D Not my prob if those 2facts push your bu.ttons.You're barking up the wrong"dead"tree X-D My roots are firmly planted
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 11:58 am
(#77559) correction: you have 'the freedom' to BS and be dishonest.only you would see that as "a right", mostly because you lack the integrity and moral authority to see past your own "ignorance." no one buys your pretending-to-be-a-mod "routine." X-D
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:37 am
and I understand perfectly well why you are afraid to debate me and it's not that it gets h**, it's that you can't do it without losing your cool or using the name calling routine you are so well know for.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:23 am
Fauxnews: I did move on until I saw this ignorant poster. I reserve the right to point out ignorance where I see it.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:20 am
If the citizens had just STFU, those two laws I cited would still be the "Law of the Land". Unjust laws and SCOTUS rulings need to be protested by citizens to get them fixed.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:19 am
Looks like you completely missed my point. Look at the wording in the poster, now look at how previous rulings were "Laws of the Land" and were overturned later. Now add the fauxnews statement "kindly STFU" Says a lot that I had to explain that to you.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:17 am
I'm not worked up any more than anyone else on this site. The fact that you can't see that speaks volumes.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 8:16 am
nah, sounds like fauxnews had his but.tons pushed. Try reading comments before coming to conclusions.
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:35 am
when you get all worked up like that over constitutional law, your reasoning becomes [dare I say] so emotional it is pretty darn ga.y. Or to quote you, "Oooooo." Ga.y indeed. Fitting ^_^
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:26 am
By citing examples of how present Supreme court rulings take precedent over the past,you're only making his point for him -ie.at present,ga.y marriage is the law of your land.Glad to see you accept it,albeit unintentionally.Take a deep breath next time EM
guest818 - July 1, 2015, 4:22 am
Hmm.Sounds like your b.uttons were pushed again,EM ^.^ You're so angry over this that you can't see things straight - i.e.the Supreme ct. since 1850 and 1920 has overruled BOTH examples.Until that happens with g** marriage,it remains your law of the land.
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 1:48 am
Nothing good ever comes from our exchanges other than disruption of this forum. So, for the sake of peace on the site: pretty please 'with sugar on top', grow a spine and actually stick to your own words for a change and "MOVE ON."(#77120) Cheers.
fauxnews - July 1, 2015, 1:43 am
I thought you said you were "moving on."(#77120)Your exact words,were "As you requested, i'm moving on." So why don't you be a good little troll and follow your own advice.Im not debating somebody whose obviously been aggressively trying to antagonize me.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 1, 2015, 12:17 am
Or the 18th amendment (prohibition) and the fact that SCOTUS upheld it in 1920. I wonder if people were telling everyone "It's the law of the land. Now kindly STFU"?
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 30, 2015, 11:53 pm
You might want to read the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 and SCOTUS opinions approving of it.


Sweet Jesus -


TAGS: g** marriage jesus supreme court
Rating: 3.53/5

More politifakes by guest818

guest818 - July 8, 2015, 5:08 pm
5) A simple internet search reveals ancient aliens exist, proof for the Lochness monster, fans of Paris Hilton, and the illuminati. It's not proof of anything other than how your sociopathic logic gets the better of you in these "debates." *Amen*
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:40 pm
4) Thank you for proving my point. ^_^
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:39 pm
3) Even with that debunked, this poster wasn't about the rest of the bible. It's about Jesus. Rome had a lot of g.ay activity for its time. Jesus was very thorough in his teachers. If he had prob with it, he would've said something on it.
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:38 pm
2) Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis does not explicitly identify ho.mo***uality as the sin of that hedonistic morality tale, it's concerned with the violent r.ape of guests and slaves.
guest818 - July 8, 2015, 4:36 pm
1) BS. 6:9 20:13 Refer to the holiness Code, a code of purity meant to distinguish the behavior of Israelites from the Canaanites. It's a very warped and contemporary reading of those passages from many a translated text to get to that political meaning.
MMessEnnBeeCee - July 8, 2015, 4:17 pm
I don't know the bible or the teachings of Jesus, but a simple internet search reveals that the bible does address homo***uality in at least the following verses: 1 Corinthians 6:9 Leviticus 20:13 Jude 1:7 IDK if Jesus had said anything about it
Zeitguy - July 8, 2015, 2:10 pm
Amen


evolving positions -




So how a b o u t you S T F U ? -




Straight outta appeals -


TAGS: county clerk kim davis marriage
Rating: 1.44/5

More politifakes by Dwydwyyr

Dwydwyyr - September 4, 2015, 10:19 am
...I calling it what it is:insane.Apparently the conservatives in your culture agrees with me and the dumb b*tch is in jail.Good riddance.As for me,Im neither a believer in God or in the institution of Holy Matrimony.To those that are,they're pills 4 that
Dwydwyyr - September 4, 2015, 10:17 am
Never made it about Democraps vs Republitards.Was about Xtian nutters vs.democratic society.How does that make me a hypocrite?A woman who got married 4Xs in violation of her own religious beliefs denies a license to others based on the same beliefs
Olympusmanager - September 3, 2015, 8:10 pm
You do realize that she's a democrat and the judge is a Republican, and YOU'RE THE HYPOCRITE, RIGHT?


contextomy -


TAGS: baltimore riots marriage selective quotes
Rating: 1/5

More politifakes by calron

rebeccaolsen - May 25, 2015, 8:19 pm
tl;dc ft :)
calron - May 25, 2015, 8:18 pm
Sorry of the facts are not good enough for you, though this is a good example of how you a**ume what I mean in the face of actual evidence and attack that instead of what is actually said, try reading the description next time.
RonaldReagan - May 21, 2015, 2:16 pm
heh heh No. I wasn't buying his malarkey before it was cool.
Zeitguy - May 17, 2015, 9:53 pm
No
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:07 pm
Nope.
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 11:59 am
Is anyone buying this?
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:48 pm
statement all what they stated all I could see was, so proved yourself knowingly puttering falsehoods to push your own ideas.
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:46 pm
what I meant with clear evidence pointing just the opposite direction and then reaching conclusions based of that false a**umption just because you all missed the point. And for one of you you contradicted your own previous
calron - May 16, 2015, 7:45 pm
I purposely made this a contextomy or the Fallacy of Quoting Out of Context to show how it works. Th title, the description, and the keywords all point to that. But it is nice of you to to jump all over yourselves falsely a**uming
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:47 am
Since you're in the habit of lecturing us on "basic argumentative techniques”[eg#76053] you would expect us to NOT insult your intelligence by accusing you of ignorance. I won't. I fully expected you to lie. Very predictable and poorly played on your part
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:32 am
Im not accusing you of having a hard time grasping this - someone who's so eager to present himself as knowledgable and astute as you do.But I did EXPECT you to be too stubborn to admit you were wrong,just like you're too stubborn to admit you're a denier
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:27 am
over and over again in your meltdown to end all meltdowns.
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:26 am
Yet that’s exactly what YOU DID - you deliberately took the quote out-of-context by editing out information that doesn't serve your narrative. It's not plausible this was unintentional - you bragged about being very knowledgeable about his words last week
rebeccaolsen - May 11, 2015, 6:15 am
If you truly believed “contextomy” is a sin (i.e. intentionally taking words out-of-context to fallaciously DECEIVE others) then why did YOU DECEIVE your audience by withholding from them the quote-in-its-entirety if you think the quote speaks for itself?
DebtToAmerica - May 11, 2015, 1:59 am
and if people dont start to stand up to this ****, eventually we'll all be treated the same way african americans are treated today, because if the police/government can get away with taking away one group's rights, what stops them from taking all rights?
DebtToAmerica - May 11, 2015, 1:51 am
the war on drugs is nothing more than an excuse to wage war on african american communities, we treat these people like f***ing criminals just because their skin is dark, and yet we act like they're in the wrong when they use violence to defend themselves
DebtToAmerica - May 11, 2015, 1:45 am
its not g**s causing the baltimore riots and general unrest among black communities, its the f***ing discrimination and persecution they face at the hands of police.
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:45 pm
Then, of course, there is the 'leading' sentence of the article YOU offered as proof, "[Rep. Flores] suggested Tues.that the ongoing unrest in Baltimore is largely due to the “breakdown of the family,” which he tied to the legalization of g** marriage."
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:42 pm
"Each of us have a mother and a father and there's no way to get around that." Ironically,w/the rest of that quote,an intelligent person would think your poster's making fun of Flores's "contextomy" of taking the riots out of context to rail on g.ays(3/3)
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:36 pm
"...and they can raise children in a way that’s best for their future, not only socially but psychologically, economically, from a health perspective. There is nothing like traditional marriage that does that for a child..."(2/3)
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:35 pm
Here is the rest of the ACTUAL quote, mate. Flores continues,"Look at what is going on in Baltimore today, you see the issues that are raised there. Healthy marriages are the ones between a MAN and a WOMAN because they can have a healthy family..." (1/3)
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 10:31 pm
Why didn't you USE the full quote, denier? :) You conveniently stopped the quote right at the part where Flores then links the riots to g** marriage. Isn't it "contextomy" to purposely take a quote out of context by leaving out important parts like u did?


PREV PAGE